LearnAdapt Agentic Studio and PedOS 1.1 Lumina have been accepted to the AIED 2026 Interactive Events Track and selected to be showcased at the 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. This milestone recognises our work on no-code pedagogical plugin authoring, enabling teachers to move from classroom problems to AI teammates they can build, inspect, edit, govern, and adapt for real learning contexts.
We are excited to share that Critsly has been accepted to the AIED 2026 Interactive Events Track and selected to be showcased at the 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Our submission, “Critsly: An Artefact-Aware AI Critique Teammate for Design Education and Project-Based Learning”, will be featured as part of the interactive programme,… Read more: Critsly Selected for Showcase at AIED 2026
Agentic AI refers to autonomous systems capable of setting goals, planning and executing multi‑step workflows across educational tools. A 2026 review of 28 studies found that most teacher‑AI collaboration involves AI supporting lesson planning and content generation rather than true co‑design. With analysts predicting that 40 % of enterprise applications will embed specialised AI agents by 2026, now is the time to involve teachers in shaping equitable, personalised AI for education.
AI tutors can help students reach the right answer faster, but correctness alone does not prove durable understanding. As AI becomes more embedded in education, we need to ask whether learners are truly building mastery, or simply performing well with assistance. The future of educational AI should not just optimise for immediate success, but for learning that lasts beyond the task, the session, and the next gap.
In our rapid pursuit of educational innovation, we frequently fall victim to a new kind of mythology. When a learner interacts with a monolithic Large Language Model, the process is heavily shrouded in an illusion of magic—a frictionless exchange that conceals the critical, underlying cognitive mechanics. We are tempted to treat these black-box systems as modern oracles, marketing their automated outputs as the ultimate solution to educational scaling. Yet, this uncritical adoption risks prioritizing mere performance over the delicate scaffolding required for true understanding. To reclaim the integrity of the classroom, we must transition away from the passive consumption of this ‘universal magic.’ The future of learning requires an explicit, orchestrated design. True machine pedagogical intelligence does not just conjure a perfect answer from the ether; it makes its instructional decisions transparent and interpretable, ensuring that the technology serves the human ‘relish in learning’ rather than eroding the authenticity of the student’s own cognitive journey.
LearnAdapt Agentic Studio and PedOS 1.1 Lumina have been accepted to the AIED 2026 Interactive Events Track and selected to be showcased at the 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. This milestone recognises our work on no-code pedagogical plugin authoring, enabling teachers to move from classroom problems to AI teammates they can build, inspect, edit, govern, and adapt for real learning contexts.
We are excited to share that Critsly has been accepted to the AIED 2026 Interactive Events Track and selected to be showcased at the 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Our submission, “Critsly: An Artefact-Aware AI Critique Teammate for Design Education and Project-Based Learning”, will be featured as part of the interactive programme,… Read more: Critsly Selected for Showcase at AIED 2026
Agentic AI refers to autonomous systems capable of setting goals, planning and executing multi‑step workflows across educational tools. A 2026 review of 28 studies found that most teacher‑AI collaboration involves AI supporting lesson planning and content generation rather than true co‑design. With analysts predicting that 40 % of enterprise applications will embed specialised AI agents by 2026, now is the time to involve teachers in shaping equitable, personalised AI for education.
AI tutors can help students reach the right answer faster, but correctness alone does not prove durable understanding. As AI becomes more embedded in education, we need to ask whether learners are truly building mastery, or simply performing well with assistance. The future of educational AI should not just optimise for immediate success, but for learning that lasts beyond the task, the session, and the next gap.
In our rapid pursuit of educational innovation, we frequently fall victim to a new kind of mythology. When a learner interacts with a monolithic Large Language Model, the process is heavily shrouded in an illusion of magic—a frictionless exchange that conceals the critical, underlying cognitive mechanics. We are tempted to treat these black-box systems as modern oracles, marketing their automated outputs as the ultimate solution to educational scaling. Yet, this uncritical adoption risks prioritizing mere performance over the delicate scaffolding required for true understanding. To reclaim the integrity of the classroom, we must transition away from the passive consumption of this ‘universal magic.’ The future of learning requires an explicit, orchestrated design. True machine pedagogical intelligence does not just conjure a perfect answer from the ether; it makes its instructional decisions transparent and interpretable, ensuring that the technology serves the human ‘relish in learning’ rather than eroding the authenticity of the student’s own cognitive journey.